Let us conclude the Content by starting from the beginning. We wish to define the opposing positions of HR Practice.
Firstly, Integrity:- This when and where HR is practiced according to the laid down policies and procedures. HR does not take decisions based on skin colour or the size of the head of who is issuing the instructions.
Every employee is treated equally. Monkey who is the head is not always right, if it goes outside the standard procedures.
The HR Professional remains the light of the organisation. Where there perceived breaches of the rules, HR gives an unbiased position.
Secondly, Food HR Practice on the other hand see integrity as unnecessary rigidity. Here, Monkey head is always right.
For Stomach Infrastructure HR Practice, every situation is to be handled in isolation.
Here, company policies and procedures are to fit into individuals and situations. Here, you to reinvent wheel.
Here, Nepotism plays a significant role the application of company policies and procedures
When the HR Professional points to company rules, is interested as stubborn.
Against what a majority current HR Practitioners believe, 90% of them are into Food HR Practice. The only why you find many sit put in Toxic companies claiming there on jobs out there.
Some of my personal experiences:
- In my active work period, I worked in four Public Limited Companies.
I resigned from two of them and because of insistence on doing the right things my positions were declared redundant.
In one of these PLCs, I became such a huge treat that I was cross- transferred out of HR but retained my grade and salary.
In another, against the position of the Head of HR, I ordered the termination of the appointment of the Vice Chairman of Branch Union.
Finally, take from me, that there still jobs for HR Professionals who have their integrity unlike the Food HR Practitioners who jump at anything to provide food on the table for the family.
Comments
Post a Comment